3M Chemical Operations (Cottage Grove) - Wastewater Permit

104 Results

Sort:

Comment From: Janice Nibi Ogichidaa Ikwe Erickson

8/30/24 @ 11:57 PM
I'm officially asking for an extension on this Comment period. We live, work, hunt, fish, gather, and our kids play at the Prairie Island Indian Community. My family and my community are directly affected by this devastating life changing forever che...
No attachments

Comment From: Rocky Erickson

8/30/24 @ 9:54 PM
Hello, I am a youth in the Prairie Island Indian Community, a reservation in Welch, MN. The Mississippi River is sacred to my people and me as it is where we fish, play, canoe, and go ricing, which is why I was concerned when I read that this permit ...
No attachments

Comment From: Theress Ziebarth

8/30/24 @ 8:27 PM
I am opposed to a permit that would allow contaminants (PFAS) that will pollute the waters. As an Indigenous citizen who supports the land improvements and restoration of the Mni Sota Makoce, I recognize the dangerous impact contamination can have o...
No attachments

Comment From: Metropolitan Council (Amanda Cerne)

8/30/24 @ 4:17 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: Federal Water Quality Coalitio... (Fredric Andes)

8/30/24 @ 3:50 PM
Attached are comments of the Federal Water Quality Coalition regarding the Draft Permit for the 3M Chemical Operations facility in Cottage Grove, Minnesota, Wastewater Permit No. MN0001449. If you have any questions, please contact me. Thank you.
Attachments:

Comment From: PFAS Regulatory Coalition (Fredric Andes)

8/30/24 @ 3:41 PM
Attached are comments of the PFAS Regulatory Coalition regarding the Draft Permit for the 3M Chemical Operation Facility in Cottage Grove, Minnesota, Wastewater Permit No. MN0001449. If you have any questions, please contact me. Thank you.
Attachments:

Comment From: American Chemistry Council (Carly Zaccaria)

8/30/24 @ 3:37 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: ALTRA - SANEXEN (MARTIN BUREAU)

8/30/24 @ 3:33 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: EPA (Stephen Jann)

8/30/24 @ 3:30 PM
See attachment.
Attachments:

Comment From: City of Hastings (Dan Wietecha)

8/30/24 @ 3:23 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: 3M Chemical Operations LLC (Elizabeth Schmiesing)

8/30/24 @ 3:12 PM
Please find attached the comments of 3M Chemical Operations LLC as well as Exhibits A-L and Appendix 1 and 2, and a Petition for Contested Case Hearing.
Attachments:

Comment From: Minnesota Center for Environme... (Akilah Sanders-Reed)

8/30/24 @ 2:12 PM
Please find attached the comments of the Clean Water Organizations (City of Newport, Clean Water Action Minnesota, CURE, Environment America, Environment Minnesota, Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy, Roots Return Heritage Farm LLC, and the ...
Attachments:

Comment From: National Waste & Recycling Ass... (Amber Backhaus)

8/30/24 @ 2:10 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: Angelique EagleWoman

8/30/24 @ 1:20 PM
As a law professor and Dakota Woman, I am strongly opposed to a permit allowing PFAs and known contaminants as discharges into the Mississippi River or any waterways in Minnesota. As the Prairie Island Indian Community has sounded the alarm on contam...
No attachments

Comment From: Prairie Island Indian Communit... (Gabriel Miller)

8/30/24 @ 12:22 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: Aida Mendez

8/30/24 @ 11:46 AM
Good morning,


1. I think that it would be prudent to sample non-targeted PFAS three times in the life of the permit and if the permit expires and is not reissued within the next five years and so on, keep sampling non-targeted PFAS three times ever...
No attachments

Comment From: Emily Seefeldt

8/30/24 @ 10:42 AM
The only acceptable level of forever chemicals is zero. Disrupting an ecosystem can happen quickly.
Protecting water, wildlife, plants, trees, beaches, and lands is imperative
No attachments

Comment From: Environment America Research &... (John Rumpler)

8/30/24 @ 10:20 AM
Dear Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Staff,

Attached please find 3 sets of comments from a total 35,485 individuals - all calling for a stronger permit that does not allow 3M to release any type of PFAS chemicals from its Cottage Grove facility i...
Attachments:

Comment From: Allison Northrop

8/29/24 @ 9:07 PM
Controlling and eliminating PFA's in the Mississippi as well as ground water is of extreme importance. Stricter regulations need to be implemented to make water safe for everyone and wild life. This is a minor step in holding 3M accountable for the h...
No attachments

Comment From: Kent Simon

8/29/24 @ 2:59 PM
This measure is absolutely necessary and long overdue. I cannot comment on how effective the requirements will be, as I'm not sufficiently knowledgably. I can say that the requirements cannot be too stringent! The stricter the better! PFAS has conta...
No attachments

Comment From: Washington County - Public Hea... (Adriana Atcheson)

8/29/24 @ 2:58 PM
Washington County Public Health and Environment Department's comment letter.
Attachments:

Comment From: Tony Kwilas

8/29/24 @ 1:04 PM
Attached are the comments of the Minnesota Chamber of Commerce.
Attachments:

Comment From: Prairie Island Indian Communit... (Annjelica Bennett )

8/28/24 @ 7:29 PM
This shouldn't be aloud to renew in this manner. The water is indigestible already. There should be zero waste, zero motor boats and nothing polluting or interfering with natural resources of something you don't own, gather resources from, have treat...
No attachments

Comment From: Caleb Merendino

8/28/24 @ 1:32 AM
Honorable officials,

The Mississippi River runs for more than 2,300 miles through the heart of our country. It surges through woodlands and across floodplains, sheltering hundreds of species of wildlife and providing drinking water to more than 20 m...
No attachments

Comment From: Dean Borgeson

8/27/24 @ 7:27 AM
Limit the release of PFAS into the environment before the impact and extent of its damage are fully understood. This should have been the approach fifty years ago.
No attachments

Comment From: Richard VandenDolder

8/26/24 @ 4:02 PM
The proposed wastewater treatment facility looks promising and beneficial for this area and may serve as a model for other communities plagued by the irresponsible contamination of their water by many varied industries. Because of the lamentable his...
No attachments

Comment From: Mary Faulkner

8/26/24 @ 3:46 PM
3M should not be allowed to dump anything that might be hazardous to any one using the river water. Water is finite and needs to be protected.
No attachments

Comment From: Annette Oresick

8/24/24 @ 10:32 AM
PFAS are named forever chemicals for a reason. I appreciate and am grateful for anything that is enacted to lower these chemicals that seem to be everywhere now and monitor and hold accountable the companies violating set emissions. I would also like...
No attachments

Comment From: Jamie B

8/24/24 @ 9:50 AM
Just as I suspected; our government doesn't care.
No attachments

Comment From: Jennifer Cummings

8/23/24 @ 6:08 PM
NO! Right the ship and catch up with the times by making the operations SUSTAINABLE. If 3M is going to continue unsustainable practices then let them fail, or they can figure out how to be sustainable and compete within the rules. We shall be ruined ...
No attachments

Comment From: Gina Hugo

8/23/24 @ 4:32 PM
We should be moving away from discharge into surface waters even with limits this poses a risk through bio accumulation and alters hydrology in an unnatural way. In no way should we as the state of 10,000 lakes (we know it is way more) be tolerating...
No attachments

Comment From: Caleb Merendino

8/23/24 @ 2:10 PM
Honorable officials,

The Mississippi River runs for more than 2,300 miles through the heart of our country. It surges through woodlands and across floodplains, sheltering hundreds of species of wildlife and providing drinking water to more than 20 m...
No attachments

Comment From: Nicole Maki

8/23/24 @ 11:46 AM
Please do not increase the allowable maximum load of total suspended solids. Please maintain or decrease current the allowable maximum load of total suspended solids.

I am currently a resident of Duluth, MN, but I grew up in Cottage Grove. Regardle...
No attachments

Comment From: Eileen Lewis

8/23/24 @ 10:22 AM
Please do not allow 3M to put more harmful forever chemicals in our water. It already had deleterious effects and we need to protect our water, not only for our state, but for all of the states downstream from us. Water is life.
No attachments

Comment From: Joseph Wenzel

8/22/24 @ 10:07 AM
Please do not release any amount of pollution into our communities.

Thank you,
Joseph Wenzel
No attachments

Comment From: Matt goebel

8/21/24 @ 9:20 PM
Who do we contact for the future diminished value of our homes?. We've already had to install water filtration systems with our wells in our homes to keep our families safe from 3M pollution...these huge home filters along with this new over-pollut...
No attachments

Comment From: Mindy Fransen

8/21/24 @ 8:35 PM
Down stream we can't even drink the water and we want to okay them dumping more pollutants. I'm sorry if I can't trust them when they've already broken that trust so many times.
No attachments

Comment From: Trygve Steen, Ph.D.

8/17/24 @ 1:18 PM
Thank you for the opportunity to respond to this 3M draft water quality permit. Although I no longer live in Minnesota, I was raised there and have lived in Portland Oregon for the last 50 years (after receiving a Ph.D. in biology and an MPH in envi...
No attachments

Comment From: Susan Griebel

8/15/24 @ 10:46 AM
I support the new draft permit that lowers allowable PFAS levels and strengthens guidelines for monitoring groundwater, regular reporting, and community engagement and accountability from 3M. This is long overdue. Be sure to put some teeth into the r...
No attachments

Comment From: Sheila Dillon

8/14/24 @ 2:53 PM
It's about time consumers were protected as we have wrongly assumed that our drinking water was safe and not make us or our families sick. I am so tired of worrying about all of the waste products discharged into our waterways, only to end up in our...
No attachments

Comment From: City of Cottage Grove (City of Cottage Grove (Crystal Raleigh))

8/14/24 @ 8:17 AM
Please see attached file for City of Cottage Grove comments on 3M's draft wastewater permit. We are happy to answer any questions that you may have regarding the comments.
Attachments:

Comment From: Amanda Mosiniak

8/14/24 @ 8:04 AM
I support stronger regulations for the environment. I support the notion that we should all clean up after ourselves, especially corporations making money at our expense. Protect the land and water. Thank you
No attachments

Comment From: Loretta Boegeman

8/14/24 @ 7:22 AM
I am in favor of restricting use of PFAS.
They can cause a lifetime of damage, and we need to think of our land and our people and put them above making and releasing such dangerous chemicals
No attachments

Comment From: Harvey Bartz

8/13/24 @ 9:27 PM
I fully support the draft wastewater permit for 3M Chemical Operations in Cottage Grove. As a resident of Oak Park Heights, our health, and the health of all residents relies on the actions by the State, Washington County, and our communities to pro...

Thank you for this work.
Sincerely, Harv Bartz,
Oak Park Heights.
No attachments

Comment From: Nikki Nafziger

8/13/24 @ 9:02 PM
Pfas must be banned!
No attachments

Comment From: Theresa Beckhusen

8/13/24 @ 7:18 PM
I'm submitting a comment in support of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's wastewater permit for the 3M Cottage Grove facility. The drafted permit would lower allowable levels of PFAS and strengthens accountability for 3M. It is in everyone's in...
No attachments

Comment From: Clean Water Action Minnesota (Avonna Starck)

8/13/24 @ 12:47 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: Gail Harty Harty

8/11/24 @ 1:24 PM
Without clean water we don't have our health Without our health, we have nothing...
No attachments

Comment From: Gretchen Corkrean

8/01/24 @ 8:11 PM
I strongly support the stricter regulation of PFAS and other chemical pollutants generated by 3M. My family has lived in Woodbury for more than 20 years, and we are very invested in a safe environment for people and the wildlife that were here long b...
No attachments

Comment From: Gabriela Santiago

8/01/24 @ 6:41 PM
I appreciate that these provisions ensure that the Mississippi River and surrounding waters are safe for aquatic life and human activity. It also sends a clear message to 3M and other companies that they will be responsible for protecting our most va...
No attachments

Comment From: Brian Singer-Towns

8/01/24 @ 2:22 PM
I strongly support stronger limits and tighter restrictions on PFAs. These chemicals have been linked to many negative health effects in human beings, fish, and other animals. Thank you for proposing the strongest limits on PFAs in Minnesota history ...
No attachments

Comment From: Laura Harpestad

8/01/24 @ 8:25 AM
Please do all that is possible to provide clean water for all.
No attachments

Comment From: Bernie Nierman

7/30/24 @ 9:36 PM
Please set very strong PFAS regulations to protect us and our environment.
No attachments

Comment From: Therese OConnor

7/30/24 @ 9:19 PM
Minnesota's water and air quality is very important to not just myself, but to every Minnesotan. PFAS's are a type of a pollutant that should be a concern to us all. The fact that these are forever chemicals and their levels continue to rise in all S...
So I am asking that the MPCA put our environment and the health of each and every Minnesotan first, and draft the strongest limits possible, as to the least amount of PSFA's allowed into the environment (which really should be zero); to adapt stronger guidelines for monitoring groundwater; for regular reporting; for accountability from 3M and any & all other companies; and for community engagement.
Thank you for your time.
No attachments

Comment From: Mary Angela Harris

7/30/24 @ 3:56 PM
Please enforce strong regulations on PFAS. 3M has known of the issue for years and years!
No attachments

Comment From: Mary Schultz

7/30/24 @ 10:28 AM
It's essential that we protect our water from PFAS for the future of our communities. Please seek the strongest regulations as our children and grandchildren depend on your actions.
No attachments

Comment From: Nikki Aliota

7/29/24 @ 3:41 PM
When you think you are drinking clean water, but it is actually contaminated with PFA's, there needs to be more critical monitoring, and stricter regulations for monitoring the PFA's ( and any other pollutants in our water).
Please support stronger re...
No attachments

Comment From: Benjamin Knelman

7/29/24 @ 2:43 PM
Dear MPCA,

Please help protect all of us by setting more stringent restrictions and requirements on PFAS, which we continue to discover are more concerning than what previously we thought (or were told). I'm a big fan of 3M and I believe that having ...
No attachments

Comment From: Carla Albers

7/29/24 @ 1:31 PM
No one or corporation is above the law. Those who break the law need to have both consequences, stricter regulations and stricter monitoring. Apparently such people and corporations can't monitor their own actions!
No attachments

Comment From: Jean Carlson

7/29/24 @ 12:58 PM
Please lower allowable PFAS levels and include stronger guidelines for monitoring groundwater, regular reporting, and community engagement and accountability from 3M. The Mississippi River and surrounding waters need to be safe for aquatic life and h...
No attachments

Comment From: Gloria Karbo

7/29/24 @ 12:53 PM
I heartily support these stronger limits and restrictions on PFA's. There isn't a single thing in the world more valuable to our water supplies. They must be kept as clean as possible. Thank you.
No attachments

Comment From: Caron Gibson

7/29/24 @ 10:52 AM
Since the Mississippi River begins in Minnesota it is imperative that we monitor what ends up in this great river. It affects those communities and environments south of here that we need to consider.
No attachments

Comment From: Domonic Stone

7/29/24 @ 10:49 AM
Protect our waters and lands.
Future Generations depend on the actions we take today. Do not relent, do not let big corporate America destroy public assets just so they can make money.
No attachments

Comment From: Steven Reid

7/29/24 @ 7:22 AM
I lived, enjoyed outdoor activities, hunted, worked, and raised my family in Minnesota. Although I live in the beautiful state of Florida now, I will be moving back to Minnesota to once again enjoy what your beautiful state has to offer.

The company t...

I do not see that setting limits on PFAS as a hindrance to business but rather a responsibility of 3M to protect the people who work or live near its facilities and for all Minnesotans. Minnesota is where the Mississippi begins; imagine if you had no limits on PFAS or any controls on what else flows into those waters. Every state downstream that the great Mississippi runs through, and the farms and residents that use the Mississippi, are affected by the limits Minnesota sets.

The change for stronger PFAS limits is justified to keep Minnesotans and those downstream safe.
No attachments

Comment From: Jeanine Smegal

7/28/24 @ 9:10 PM
Help stop the poluting of our environment
No attachments

Comment From: Susan Soule

7/28/24 @ 7:26 PM
I strongly support and urge the approval of the conditions for the 3M Cottage Grove Waste Water permit. We are talking about forever chemicals affecting one of Minnesota's greatest resources. We must be proactive in preserving and protecting the Miss...
No attachments

Comment From: Jean Ross

7/28/24 @ 4:56 PM
The draft wastewater permit for the 3M Cottage Grove facility contains some of the strongest limits on PFAS in Minnesota history. It lowers allowable PFAS levels and includes stronger guidelines for monitoring groundwater, regular reporting, and comm...
No attachments

Comment From: JoAnn Ward

7/28/24 @ 3:38 PM
The aquifer is a precious resource and must be protected to provide clean, safe water for all lives. The ground water is all connected. What happens in one impacts others. Please ensure the safety of our water.
No attachments

Comment From: Kelsey Brodt

7/28/24 @ 3:07 PM
I support the MPCA strengthening restrictions and stronger limits on toxic chemicals like PFAS. They should not even be allowed to discharge any into water since water is life.
No attachments

Comment From: Kathy Parkin

7/28/24 @ 2:20 PM
It is of the utmost importance that these stronger regulations regarding PFAs are put into place. It is well known of the toxicity that is associated with these chemicals, and companies such as 3M need to be held accountable for the discharged wastew...
No attachments

Comment From: Candace Kragthorpe

7/28/24 @ 2:11 PM
Please continue to strengthen limits on PFAS.
Thank you.
No attachments

Comment From: Sheila Dillon

7/28/24 @ 1:48 PM
Sick and tired of all the plastics in our environment that we now find in our bodies. Health problems would plummet if these deadly chemicals were never allowed.
No attachments

Comment From: Alice Meadow

7/28/24 @ 1:20 PM
Frankly, I do not understand why there is even a question about banning these pollutants entirely. Yes make the wastewater pristine. Allowing limited amounts still is poisoning the environment and all who rely on water for life itself.
No attachments

Comment From: Jeffrey Lockhart

7/28/24 @ 12:55 PM
I support the proposed legislation. Please set strong PFAS regulations to protect our waterways.
No attachments

Comment From: Daniel Addis

7/28/24 @ 12:45 PM
To Whom It May Concern,

As a concerned citizen, I am writing to express my strong opposition to the draft wastewater permit for 3M Chemical Operations in Cottage Grove. Given 3M's long history of environmental violations and its ongoing legal battles ...

The facility in Cottage Grove, which manufactures a wide array of products including PFAS compounds, has been a significant source of pollution. The inclusion of PFAS compounds in their chemical production is particularly alarming given the well-documented persistence and bioaccumulative nature of these substances. PFAS are known to have severe health impacts, including cancer, liver damage, and immune system disruption, and their presence in the environment is a matter of grave concern.

While the draft permit sets new discharge limits for six PFAS compounds, seven heavy metals, and 55 semi-volatile or volatile organics, among other pollutants, it is insufficient to mitigate the long-term environmental and health risks associated with 3M's operations. Allowing the facility to discharge up to 15.2 million gallons of treated wastewater per day into an unnamed creek that flows into the Mississippi River poses a significant threat to aquatic life, recreational water use, and human fish consumption.

The requirement for PFAS monitoring in various locations, including treated wastewater and fish tissue, is a step in the right direction. However, monitoring alone is not enough. We need enforceable limits and stringent penalties for any violations to ensure that 3M adheres to the highest standards of environmental protection.

Moreover, the proposed modification to increase the maximum load of total suspended solids in the South Metro Mississippi River total suspended solids study is deeply concerning. Increasing the permissible load from 545 kilograms per day to 1,532 kilograms per day could exacerbate the already critical situation in the South Metro Mississippi River, which is impaired by total suspended solids.

Heavy metals, which are ubiquitous in the environment and can accumulate in human food sources, present another significant concern. These pollutants are highly toxic and can have severe health effects, including neurological damage and various cancers. The environment has a limited capacity to deal with heavy metals, and it is our responsibility to handle them with the utmost care. Simply dumping these substances, even in treated forms, is irresponsible and dangerous. The draft permit must include stricter limits and more comprehensive measures to control and reduce the discharge of heavy metals to ensure they do not further contaminate our water bodies and food supply.

In light of 3M's notorious environmental record and the potential risks to our water quality and public health, I urge the MPCA to reconsider the draft wastewater permit. We must prioritize the health and safety of our community and environment over the interests of a corporation with a history of environmental disregard.

Please take a stand to protect Cottage Grove and the Mississippi River from further contamination. Deny the draft wastewater permit for 3M Chemical Operations and implement more rigorous measures to hold them accountable for their pollution.

Sincerely,

Daniel Addis
6960 93rd St S.
Cottage Grove, MN 55016
651-357-0564
No attachments

Comment From: Melissa Schoenke

7/28/24 @ 12:18 PM
This water quality permit is an important action to protect the waterways that humans, wildlife and businesses rely on. This should provoke innovation at 3M and other companies to find ways to manufacture with better knowledge of their impact and mor...
No attachments

Comment From: Michelle McQuillen

7/28/24 @ 12:14 PM
Thank you for your efforts!
No attachments

Comment From: JL Charrier

7/28/24 @ 12:02 PM
I support stronger limits and restrictions on PFAS.
No attachments

Comment From: Cheryl Olseth

7/28/24 @ 11:47 AM
Please ensure tighter restrictions on PFAS. We must implement stronger guidelines for monitoring groundwater, regular reporting, and community engagement and accountability from 3M and other manufacturers of this hazardous chemical.
No attachments

Comment From: Philip Holtegaard

7/28/24 @ 11:05 AM
Yes, please place tighter controls on these dangerous chemicals.
No attachments

Comment From: Monica Allen

7/28/24 @ 11:04 AM
I expect our state regulators to keep us and our lakes and rivers safe.

I support stronger limits and restrictions on PFAS.
No attachments

Comment From: Dawnette Davis

7/28/24 @ 10:52 AM
Please protect our environment for our children, grandchildren and generations to come as well as all sentient beings.
No attachments

Comment From: Blair Erickson

7/28/24 @ 10:50 AM
Please consider those that will be here, left with the aftermath of our actions. Would you want to be born into, and live in a toxic world? What type of world do you want for your children?
No attachments

Comment From: Paul Ryals

7/28/24 @ 10:48 AM
It is important that you keep permissible pollutant levels as low as possible to preserve, and even improve, the quality of all of Minnesota's groundwater.

Thank you
No attachments

Comment From: Marcia Novak

7/28/24 @ 10:39 AM
Thank you for supporting and enacting strict measures to prevent 3m and other corporations from polluting our water-a precious and finite resource- with PSAF and other toxic compounds. Your actions enacting stricter regulations protect our health and...
No attachments

Comment From: Mary Zink

7/28/24 @ 10:27 AM
I support the MPCA plans for much stricter monitoring of PFAS and other toxic chemicals as well as potentially toxic Compounds in water at cottage Grove, but also all around our state and nation. As a retired healthcare professional and grandmother t...
No attachments

Comment From: Beverly A Sherwood

7/28/24 @ 10:24 AM
Please seriously consider the draft of the PFAS regulation in Minnesota.
No attachments

Comment From: Frieda Wilson

7/28/24 @ 9:57 AM
It js encouraging to hear that 3M will be required to protect communities from the dangers of PFA's in their wastewater. The technology is available for them to be good citizens and support the community they service.
No attachments

Comment From: Lorenzo Tunesi

7/28/24 @ 9:54 AM
The health risks of PFAs are well documented and widely known, and we expect our state regulators to keep us and our lakes and rivers safe.
Thank you!
No attachments

Comment From: Debra D Smith

7/28/24 @ 8:49 AM
I strongly support these new guidelines.
No attachments

Comment From: Beth Artmann

7/28/24 @ 8:28 AM
I don't think it is wise to loosen the permit on any amount of PFAS entering the water. Why take the chance on further endangering the water quality.
No attachments

Comment From: Annette Oresick

7/28/24 @ 8:28 AM
The elimination of chemicals from our water and soil is very important to me. It not only effects our health, but the health of all living beings on our planet. Thank you.
No attachments

Comment From: Lindsey Taveren

7/28/24 @ 8:26 AM
For the health of our community, please set stronger PFAS regulations.
No attachments

Comment From: George Kelzer

7/28/24 @ 8:26 AM
Please pass this.
No attachments

Comment From: Steven Chesney

7/28/24 @ 8:19 AM
So many commercial and industrial products contain fresh sources of PFAS which will accumulate in the environment and our bodies. It's time to stop this so we can figure out how to remove it.
No attachments

Comment From: Eric Wurm

7/28/24 @ 8:10 AM
The 3M company has already received the public by omission, having known for decades that PFAS chemicals were persistent, and finding their way into human blood streams. We have all been victimized. 3M needs to be monitored as if in criminal probatio...
No attachments

Comment From: Mary Williams

7/28/24 @ 7:47 AM
MPCA needs to support and set strong standards on PFAs. As a cancer survivor there is no excuse for allowing toxic chemicals that can kill people in our, water, soil or air.
No attachments

Comment From: Brianna Mann

7/28/24 @ 7:46 AM
MPCA: We need you to set strong PFAS regulations!
No attachments

Comment From: Susan Dewey

7/28/24 @ 7:42 AM
We only have so much safe water. Protecting it is essential. If we have learned anything in our lives as humans on this planet it's that what we don't know far exceeds what we think we do. Disrupting our ecosystems can happen quickly, and what dis...
No attachments

Comment From: Eric Berger

7/25/24 @ 8:40 AM
I support this plan to limit pollutants released by the 3-M plant and monitoring for PFAS and other pollutants.
No attachments

[ Previous Page / Next Page ]