Preliminary Assessment for the Packaging Waste and Cost Reduction Act

20 Results

Sort:

Comment From: Kimberly Davis

12/22/25 @ 10:53 PM
Dear MPCA,

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Preliminary Assessment for the Packaging Waste and Cost Reduction Act. Please find BPI's comments in the attached pdf.

Sincerely,
Kimberly Davis
Attachments:

Comment From: Will Grassle

12/22/25 @ 9:12 PM
December 22, 2025

VIA Public Comment Form

Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
520 Lafayette Road N
St. Paul, MN 55155-4194

Re: Minnesota's Preliminary Assessment for the Packaging Waste and Cost Reduction Act

As the association for the consumer-pa...↓
Attachments:

Comment From: Kris Coperine

12/22/25 @ 5:46 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: Rachel Ricchio

12/22/25 @ 5:25 PM
We at Green Group Consulting agree with the review and recommendations provided by the advisory council. We think it would be worthwhile to review how different implementations of The Opportunity to Recycle law and its funding structures affect recyc...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Walter Reiter

12/22/25 @ 2:38 PM
Attached please find comments submitted by the EPS Industry Alliance.
Attachments:

Comment From: Jordan Fengel

12/22/25 @ 2:37 PM
Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments regarding the Preliminary Assessment for the Packaging Waste and Cost Reduction Act; please find the attached comments submitted by the Carton Council.
Please feel free to reach out with any question...↓
Attachments:

Comment From: Minnesota Composting Council

12/22/25 @ 12:00 PM
Please see the attached comments from the Minnesota Composting Council on the draft Preliminary Needs Assessment.

Thank you and let us know if you have any questions.
Attachments:

Comment From: Gabrielle Batzko-Conley

12/22/25 @ 11:58 AM
Included are corrections and suggestions relevant to the North Central Region of the EPR for the Packaging Preliminary Needs Assessment.

Counties with Recent SWMP (p.14) - Stearns, Sherburne, and Benton Counties worked together on the last SWMP. A...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Partnership on Waste & Energy Anonymous

12/22/25 @ 10:28 AM
Attachments:

Comment From: jane dow

12/21/25 @ 2:28 AM
it's important that the act have concrete goals and reduction timelines. Ideally, every two years there should be a reduction of 10%. After two years reduction should be 10% by weight; after 4 years 20%, 6 years 30%, 8 years 40% and 10 years 50%. Hav...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Andrea Albersheim

12/19/25 @ 5:11 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: Shoshana Micon

12/19/25 @ 5:05 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: Andrew Morley

12/19/25 @ 3:32 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: Lucy Mullany

12/19/25 @ 1:21 PM
Attachments:

Comment From: Miriam Holsinger

12/19/25 @ 10:15 AM
Attached are the official comments by the MN Packaging EPR Advisory Board
Attachments:

Comment From: Phillip Shaffer

12/17/25 @ 5:13 PM
On behalf of the National Waste and Recycling Association Minnesota Chapter (NWRA MN), please see the attached Preliminary Assessment comments for the Packaging Waste and Cost Reduction Act.
Attachments:

Comment From: Zack Bradford

12/16/25 @ 7:20 PM
Public Comment on Minnesota's Draft Preliminary Needs Assessment for the Packaging Waste and Cost Reduction Act

World Centric is grateful for the opportunity to provide feedback on the DRAFT Preliminary Assessment for the Packaging Waste and Cost Re...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Tessa Dee

12/08/25 @ 5:54 PM
I appreciate the opportunity to comment on the Preliminary Assessment for the Packaging Waste and Cost Reduction Act. I strongly support the Act's requirement that all packaging be refillable, reusable, recyclable, or compostable by 2032. This will m...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Kevin Zahler

11/19/25 @ 12:31 PM
Thanks, interesting information. There is such a huge need for a program that does all of the things necessary to prevent us from being buried in waste. The idea of reducing source of packaging materials is excellent, I am sure I do not know all of w...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Gary Borges

11/19/25 @ 11:15 AM
EPR is a good first step to reduce waste. Moving to more PCR resin may have issues long term.
First the more you recycle a resin the more short chains will be produced leading to likely more microplastics in the environment.
Secondly every time you...↓
No attachments